About the directory
Editorial policy
Read how EyeFellow handles official sources, uncertain programme details, historical admissions information and correction requests.
Evidence before completeness
Programme facts are drawn from official university, hospital, professional society and government sources. Search results and other directories can help locate a source, but are not used as final evidence for a new programme fact. Automated tools assist with collecting and organising information; generated text is not itself evidence.
Missing details remain missing when a source does not establish them. Conflicting official statements are described as conflicts rather than silently combined. General comparison guidance is distinguished from requirements set by a particular programme.
What a listing establishes
A programme's existence, its training duration, its eligibility criteria and a currently open vacancy are separate questions. Directory coverage is not a count of available jobs. Historical advertisements and dated salary figures retain their dates; they do not become current offers through a site rebuild.
Visa acceptance is distinguished from sponsorship, fees from salary or stipend, and optional scholarships from guaranteed funding. Currency and payment periods are not inferred from the host country. A compliance listing is described in the terms used by the source and is not converted into a different accreditation claim.
Corrections and updates
Report a suspected error to hello@eyefellow.com, including the page URL, the specific detail and a supporting official link. Corrections are assessed against the relevant source and programme identity. A successful website response alone does not establish that every fact has been reviewed.
Faculty photographs are matched to a named person on an institutional source. Unmatched images, stock portraits and placeholders are not presented as verified faculty photographs. Names and images may be corrected or removed when their identification is unsupported.